Almost volume cone implies almost metric cone for annuluses centered at a compact set in RCD(K, N)-spaces

Abstract

In CC1, Cheeger-Colding considered manifolds with lower Ricci curvature bound and gave some almost rigidity results about warped products including almost metric cone rigidity and quantitative splitting theorem. As a generalization of manifolds with lower Ricci curvature bound, for metric measure spaces in RCD(K, N), 1<N<∞, splitting theorem Gi13 and "volume cone implies metric cone" rigidity for balls and annuluses of a point PG have been proved. In this paper we will generalize Cheeger-Colding's CC1 result about "almost volume cone implies almost metric cone for annuluses of a compact subset " to RCD(K, N)-spaces. More precisely, consider a RCD(K, N)-space (X, d, m) and a Borel subset ⊂ X. If the closed subset S=∂ has finite outer curvature, the diameter diam(S)≤ D and the mean curvature of S satisfies m(x)≤ m, \, ∀ x∈ S, and equation* m(Aa, b(S))≥ (1-ε)∫ab (sn'H(r)+ mn-1snH(r))n-1dr mS(S)equation* then Aa', b'(S) is measured Gromov-Hausdorff close to a warped product (a', b')×sn'H(r)+ mn-1snH(r)Y, Aa, b(S)=\x∈ X , \, a<d(x, S)<b\, a<a'<b'<b, Y is a metric space with finite components with each component is a RCD(0, N-1)-space when m=0, K=0 and is a RCD(N-2, N-1)-space for other cases and H=KN-1. Note that when m=0, K=0, our result is a kind of quantitative splitting theorem and in other cases it is an almost metric cone rigidity. To prove this result, different from Gi13, PG, we will use GiT's second order differentiation formula and a method similar as CC1.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…