Determining the Hubble Constant without the Sound Horizon: Perspectives with Future Galaxy Surveys

Abstract

H0 constraints from galaxy surveys are sourced by the geometric properties of two standardisable rulers: the sound horizon scale, rs, and the matter-radiation equality scale, k eq. While most analyses over the last decade have focused on the first scale, recent work has emphasised that the second can provide an independent source of information about the expansion rate of the universe. Recent approaches to obtain a sound-horizon-independent measurement of H0 from the equality scale have avoided rs-based information by removing the sound-horizon-calibrating prior on the baryon density. We present a new method to marginalise over rs; this allows baryon information to be retained enabling tighter parameter constraints. For a Euclid-like spectroscopic survey, we forecast sound-horizon-independent H0 constraints of σH0 = 0.7\ km\ s-1\ Mpc-1 for our method using the equality scale, compared with σH0 = 0.5\ km\ s-1\ Mpc-1 from the sound horizon. Upcoming equality scale H0 measurements thus can be highly competitive, although we caution that the impact of observational systematics on such measurements still needs to be investigated in detail. Applying our new approach to the BOSS power spectrum gives H0 = 69.5+3.0-3.5\ km\ s-1\ Mpc-1 from equality alone, somewhat tighter than previous constraints. Consistency of rs- and k eq-based H0 measurements can provide a valuable internal consistency test of the cosmological model; as an example, we consider the change in H0 created by early dark energy. Assuming the Planck+SH0ES best-fit EDE model we find a 2.6σ shift ( H0 = 2.6\ km\ s-1\ Mpc-1) between the two measurements for Euclid; if we instead assume the ACT best-fit model, this increases to 9.0σ ( H0 = 7.8\ km\ s-1\ Mpc-1).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…