Reply to Morse and Charbonneau on "Explicit analytical solution for random close packing in $d=2$ and $d=3$"

Abstract

A Comment by Morse and Charbonneau shows that our recent analytical solution to the random close packing (RCP) problem is in good agreement with packings data in dimensions $d<6$ but deviates from the data for $d\geq6$. In this Reply we argue, using results related to the $E_{8}$ Lie group, that no RCP solution based on contact numbers and marginal stability is expected to capture RCP in large space dimensions $d \geq 8$ where a large gap exists between nearest neighbours already at $d=8$. The fact remains that the result in [A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 028002 (2022)] is currently the only simple analytical solution to the RCP problem based on statistical arguments, which captures a good deal of the underlying physics in $d=2,3,4,5$.