Searching for the connection between ionizing-photon escape and the surface density of star formation at z~3

Abstract

The connection between the escape fraction of ionizing photons (f esc) and star-formation rate surface density ( SFR) is a key input for reionization models, but remains untested at high redshift. We analyse 35 z~3 galaxies from the Keck Lyman Continuum Survey (KLCS) covered by deep, rest far-UV spectra of the Lyman continuum (LyC) and high-resolution HST V606 imaging, enabling estimates of both f esc and rest-UV sizes. Using S\'ersic profile fits to HST images and spectral-energy distribution fits to multi-band photometry, we measure effective sizes and star-formation rates for the galaxies in our sample, and separate the sample into two bins of SFR. Based on composite spectra, we estimate <f esc> for both SFR subsamples, finding no significant difference in <f esc> between the two. To test the representativeness of the KLCS HST sample and the robustness of this result, we attempt to recover the well-established correlation between f esc and Lyα equivalent width. This correlation is not significant within the KLCS HST sample, indicating that the sample is not sufficient for correlating f esc and galaxy properties such as SFR. We perform stacking simulations using the KLCS parent sample to determine the optimal sample size for robust probes of the f esc- SFR connection to inform future HST LyC observing programs. For a program with a selection independent of ionizing properties, >= 90 objects are required; for one preferentially observing strongly-leaking LyC sources, >= 58 objects are required. More generally, measuring the connection between f esc and SFR requires a larger, representative sample spanning a wide dynamic range in galaxies properties such as SFR.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…