Substructures in Latin squares

Abstract

We prove several results about substructures in Latin squares. First, we explain how to adapt our recent work on high-girth Steiner triple systems to the setting of Latin squares, resolving a conjecture of Linial that there exist Latin squares with arbitrarily high girth. As a consequence, we see that the number of order-n Latin squares with no intercalate (i.e., no 2×2 Latin subsquare) is at least (e-9/4n-o(n))n2. Equivalently, P[N=0] e-n2/4-o(n2)=e-(1+o(1))EN, where N is the number of intercalates in a uniformly random order-n Latin square. In fact, extending recent work of Kwan, Sah, and Sawhney, we resolve the general large-deviation problem for intercalates in random Latin squares, up to constant factors in the exponent: for any constant 0<δ1 we have P[N(1-δ)EN]=(-(n2)) and for any constant δ>0 we have P[N(1+δ)EN]=(-(n4/3 n)). Finally, as an application of some new general tools for studying substructures in random Latin squares, we show that in almost all order-n Latin squares, the number of cuboctahedra (i.e., the number of pairs of possibly degenerate 2×2 submatrices with the same arrangement of symbols) is of order n4, which is the minimum possible. As observed by Gowers and Long, this number can be interpreted as measuring ``how associative'' the quasigroup associated with the Latin square is.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…