The ALMA REBELS Survey. Epoch of Reionization giants: properties of dusty galaxies at z ≈ 7

Abstract

We analyse FIR dust continuum measurements for 14 galaxies (z≈ 7) in the ALMA REBELS LP to derive their physical properties. Our model uses three input data: (a) the UV spectral slope, β, (b) the observed UV continuum flux at 1500A, F UV, (c) the observed continuum flux at ≈ 158μm, F158, and considers Milky Way (MW) and SMC extinction curves, along with different dust geometries. We find that REBELS galaxies have (28-90.5)% of their star formation obscured; the total (UV+IR) star formation rates are in the range 31.5 < SFR/ (M yr-1) < 129.5. The sample-averaged dust mass and temperature are (1.3 1.1)× 107 M and 52 11 K, respectively. In some galaxies dust is abundant (REBELS-14, M'd ≈ 3.4 × 107 M), or hot (REBELS-18, T'd ≈ 67 K). The dust distribution is compact (<0.3 kpc for 70% of the galaxies). The dust yield per supernova is 0.1 yd/M 3.3, with 70% of the galaxies requiring yd < 0.25 M. Three galaxies (REBELS-12, 14, 39) require yd > 1 M. With the SFR predicted by the model and a MW extinction curve, REBELS galaxies detected in [CII] nicely follow the local L CII-SFR relation, and are approximately located on the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation. The sample-averaged gas depletion time is of 0.11\, yP-2 Gyr, where yP is the ratio of the gas-to-stellar distribution radius. For some systems a solution simultaneously matching the observed (β, F UV, F158) values cannot be found. This occurs when the index Im = (F158/F UV)/(β-β int), where β int is the intrinsic UV slope, exceeds Im*≈ 1120 for a MW curve. For these objects we argue that the FIR and UV emitting regions are not co-spatial, questioning the use of the IRX-β relation.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…