Bad list assignments for non-k-choosable k-chromatic graphs with 2k+2-vertices
Abstract
It was conjectured by Ohba, and proved by Noel, Reed and Wu that k-chromatic graphs G with |V(G)| 2k+1 are chromatic-choosable. This upper bound on |V(G)| is tight: if k is even, then K3 (k/2+1), 1 (k/2-1) and K4, 2 (k-1) are k-chromatic graphs with 2 k+2 vertices that are not chromatic-choosable. It was proved in [arXiv:2201.02060] that these are the only non-k-choosable complete k-partite graphs with 2k+2 vertices. For G =K3 (k/2+1), 1 (k/2-1) or K4, 2 (k-1), a bad list assignment of G is a k-list assignment L of G such that G is not L-colourable. Bad list assignments for G=K4, 2 (k-1) were characterized in [Discrete Mathematics 244 (2002), 55-66]. In this paper, we first give a simpler proof of this result, and then we characterize bad list assignments for G=K3 (k/2+1), 1 (k/2-1). Using these results, we characterize all non-k-choosable (non-complete) k-partite graphs with 2k+2 vertices.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.