DP color functions versus chromatic polynomials (II)
Abstract
For any connected graph G, let P(G,m) and PDP(G,m) denote the chromatic polynomial and DP color function of G, respectively. It is known that PDP(G,m) P(G,m) holds for every positive integer m. Let DP≈ (resp. DP<) be the set of graphs G for which there exists an integer M such that PDP(G,m)=P(G,m) (resp. PDP(G,m)<P(G,m)) holds for all integers m M. Determining the sets DP≈ and DP< is a key problem on the study of the DP color function. For any edge set E0 of G, let G(E0) be the length of a shortest cycle C in G such that |E(C) E0| is odd whenever such a cycle exists, and G(E0)=∞ otherwise. Write G(E0) as G(e) if E0=\e\. In this paper, we prove that if G has a spanning tree T such that G(e) is odd for each e∈ E(G) E(T), the edges in E(G) E(T) can be labeled as e1,e2,·s, eq with G(ei) G(ei+1) for all 1 i q-1 and each edge ei is contained in a cycle Ci of length G(ei) with E(Ci)⊂eq E(T) \ej: 1 j i\, then G is a graph in DP≈. As a direct application of this conclusion, all plane near-triangulations and complete multipartite graphs with at least three partite sets belong to DP≈. We also show that if E* is an edge set of G such that G(E*) is even and E* satisfies certain conditions, then G belongs to DP<. In particular, if G(E*)=4, where E* is a set of edges between two disjoint vertex subsets of G, then G belongs to DP<. Both results extend known ones in [DP color functions versus chromatic polynomials, Advances\ in\ Applied\ Mathematics 134 (2022), article 102301].
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.