Tight Lower Bounds for Approximate & Exact k-Center in Rd

Abstract

In the discrete k-center problem, we are given a metric space (P,dist) where |P|=n and the goal is to select a set C⊂eq P of k centers which minimizes the maximum distance of a point in P from its nearest center. For any ε>0, Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA '98, Algorithmica '02] designed an (1+ε)-approximation algorithm for this problem in d-dimensional Euclidean space which runs in O(dn k) + (kε)O(k1-1/d)· nO(1) time. In this paper we show that their algorithm is essentially optimal: if for some d≥ 2 and some computable function f, there is an f(k)· (1ε)o(k1-1/d) · no(k1-1/d) time algorithm for (1+ε)-approximating the discrete k-center on n points in d-dimensional Euclidean space then the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. We obtain our lower bound by designing a gap reduction from a d-dimensional constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) defined by Marx and Sidiropoulos [SoCG '14] to discrete d-dimensional k-center. As a byproduct of our reduction, we also obtain that the exact algorithm of Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA '98, Algorithmica '02] which runs in nO(d· k1-1/d) time for discrete k-center on n points in d-dimensional Euclidean space is asymptotically optimal. Formally, we show that if for some d≥ 2 and some computable function f, there is an f(k)· no(k1-1/d) time exact algorithm for the discrete k-center problem on n points in d-dimensional Euclidean space then the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Previously, such a lower bound was only known for d=2 and was implicit in the work of Marx [IWPEC '06]. [see paper for full abstract]

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…