On the choosability with separation of planar graphs and its correspondence colouring analogue

Abstract

A list assignment L for a graph G is an (,k)-list assignment if |L(v)|≥ for each v ∈ V(G) and |L(u) L(v)| ≤ k for each uv ∈ E(G). We say G is (,k)-choosable if it admits an L-colouring for every (, k)-list assignment L. We prove that if G is a planar graph with (4,2)-list assignment L and for every triangle T ⊂eq G we have that |v ∈ V(T) L(v)| ≠ 2, then G is L-colourable. In fact, we prove a slightly stronger result: if G contains a clique H such that V(H) V(T) ≠ for every triangle T ⊂eq G with |v ∈ V(T) L(v)| = 2, then G is L-colourable. Additionally, we give a counterexample to the correspondence colouring analogue of (4,2)-choosability for planar graphs.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…