Interdependence of the new "MUON G-2" Result and the W-Boson Mass

Abstract

The electroweak (EW) sector of the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM), assuming the lightest neutralino as Dark Matter (DM) candidate, can account for a variety of experimental results. In particular it can account for the discrepancy between the experimental result for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, (g-2)μ, and its Standard Model (SM) prediction. The new "MUON G-2" result, combined with the older BNL result on (g-2)μ, yields a deviation from the SM prediction of aμ = (25.1 5.9) × 10-10, corresponding to 4.2~σ. Using this updated bound, together with the other constraints, we calculate the MSSM prediction for the mass of the W boson, MW. We assume contributions only from the EW sector, with the colored sector of the MSSM taken to be heavy. We investigate five scenarios, distinguished by the mechanisms which yield a relic DM density in agreement with the latest Planck bounds. We find that with the new (g-2)μ result taken into account and depending on the scenario, values up to MWMSSM 80.376~GeV are reached. The largest values are obtained for wino DM and in the case of slepton co-annihilation, where points well within the 1\,σ range of the experimental world average of MWexp = 80.379 ~0.012~GeV are reached, whereas the SM predicts a too small value of MWSM = 80.353~GeV. We analyze the dependence of MWMSSM on the relevant masses of the EW superpartners and demonstrate that future MW measurements, e.g. at the ILC, could distinguish between various MSSM realizations. Sizable contributions to MWMSSM are associated with a relatively light 01, accompanied by either a light chargino or a light smuon, setting interesting targets for future collider searches.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…