Equivalences between different forms of the Kakeya conjecture and duality of Hausdorff and packing dimensions for additive complements
Abstract
The Kakeya conjecture is generally formulated as one the following statements: every compact/Borel/arbitrary subset of Rn that contains a (unit) line segment in every direction has Hausdorff dimension n; or, sometimes, that every closed/Borel/arbitrary subset of Rn that contains a full line in every direction has Hausdorff dimension n. These statements are generally expected to be equivalent. Moreover, the condition that the set contains a line (segment) in every direction is often relaxed by requiring a line (segment) for a "large" set of directions only, where large could mean a set of positive (n-1)-dimensional Lebesgue measure. Here we prove that all the above forms of the Kakeya conjecture are indeed equivalent. In fact, we prove that there exist d n and a compact subset C of Rn of Hausdorff dimension d that contains a unit line segment in every direction (and also a closed set of dimension d that contains a line in every direction) such that every subset S of Rn that contains a line segment in every direction of a set of Hausdorff dimension n-1, must have dimension at least d. We also obtain results on the duality of Hausdorff and packing dimensions via additive complements: For any non-empty Borel set A of Rn we show that (1) the Hausdorff dimension of A can be obtained as n-p, where p is the infimum of the packing dimension of those Borel subsets B of Rn for which A+B= Rn; and (2) the packing dimension of A can be obtained as n-h, where h is the infimum of the Hausdorff dimension of those Borel subsets B of Rn for which A+B= Rn.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.