No Redshift Evolution of Dust Temperatures from 0 < z < 2

Abstract

Some recent literature has claimed there to be an evolution in galaxies' dust temperatures towards warmer (or colder) spectral energy distributions (SEDs) between low and high redshift. These conclusions are driven by both theoretical models and empirical measurement. Such claims sometimes contradict one another and are prone to biases in samples or SED fitting techniques. What has made direct comparisons difficult is that there is no uniform approach to fitting galaxies' infrared/millimeter SEDs. Here we aim to standardize the measurement of galaxies' dust temperatures with a python-based SED fitting procedure, MCIRSED. We draw on reference datasets observed by IRAS, Herschel, and Scuba-2 to test for redshift evolution out to z2. We anchor our work to the LIR-λpeak plane, where there is an empirically observed anti-correlation between IR luminosity and rest-frame peak wavelength (an observational proxy for luminosity-weighted dust temperature) such that λpeak=λt(LIR/Lt)η where η=-0.090.01, Lt=1012 L, and λt=922μm. We find no evidence for redshift evolution of galaxies' temperatures, or λpeak, at fixed LIR from 0<z<2 with >99.99% confidence. Our finding does not preclude evolution in dust temperatures at fixed stellar mass, which is expected from a non-evolving LIR-λpeak relation and a strongly evolving SFR-M relation. The breadth of dust temperatures at a given LIR is likely driven by variation in galaxies' dust geometries and sizes and does not evolve. Testing for LIR-λpeak evolution toward higher redshift (z5-6) requires better sampling of galaxies' dust SEDs near their peaks (observed 200-600μm) with <1 mJy sensitivity. This poses a significant challenge to current instrumentation.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…