Black holes: on the universality of the Kerr hypothesis

Abstract

To what extent are all astrophysical, dark, compact objects both black holes (BHs) and described by the Kerr geometry? We embark on the exercise of defying the universality of this remarkable idea, often called the "Kerr hypothesis". After establishing its rationale and timeliness, we define a minimal set of reasonability criteria for alternative models of dark compact objects. Then, as proof of principle, we discuss concrete, dynamically robust non-Kerr BHs and horizonless imitators, that 1) pass the basic theoretical, and in particular dynamical, tests, 2) match (some of the) state of the art astrophysical observables and 3) only emerge at some (macroscopic) scales. These examples illustrate how the universality (at all macroscopic scales) of the Kerr hypothesis can be challenged.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…