Time series aggregation for optimization: One-size-fits-all?

Abstract

One of the fundamental problems of using optimization models that use different time series as data input, is the trade-off between model accuracy and computational tractability. To overcome the computational intractability of these full optimization models, the dimension of input data and model size is commonly reduced through time series aggregation (TSA) methods. However, traditional TSA methods often apply a one-size-fits-all approach based on the common belief that the clusters that best approximate the input data also lead to the aggregated model that best approximates the full model, while the metric that really matters - the resulting output error in optimization results - is not well addressed. In this paper, we plan to challenge this belief and show that output-error based TSA methods with theoretical underpinnings have unprecedented potential of computational efficiency and accuracy.