CO and [CII] line emission of molecular clouds -- the impact of stellar feedback and non-equilibrium chemistry

Abstract

We analyse synthetic 12CO, 13CO, and [CII] emission maps of simulated molecular clouds of the SILCC-Zoom project, which include an on-the-fly evolution of H2, CO, and C+. We use simulations of hydrodynamical and magnetohydrodynamical clouds, both with and without stellar feedback. We introduce a novel post-processing of the C+ abundance using CLOUDY, to account for further ionization states of carbon due to stellar radiation. We report the first self-consistent synthetic emission maps of [CII] in feedback bubbles, largely devoid of emission inside them, as recently found in observations. The C+ mass is only poorly affected by stellar feedback but the [CII] luminosity increases by 50 - 85 per cent compared to runs without feedback. Furthermore, we investigate the capability of the CO/[CII] line ratio as a tracer of the amount of H2 in the clouds and their evolutionary stage. We obtain, for both 12CO and 13CO, no clear trend of the luminosity ratio, LCO/L[CII]. It can therefore not be used as a reliable measure of the H2 mass fraction. We note a monotonic relation between LCO/L[CII] and the H2 fraction when considering the ratio for individual pixels of our synthetic maps, but with large scatter. Moreover, we show that assuming chemical equilibrium results in an overestimation of H2 and CO masses of up to 110 and 30 per cent, respectively, and in an underestimation of H and C+ masses of 65 and 7 per cent, respectively. In consequence, LCO would be overestimated by up to 50 per cent, and LC[II] be underestimated by up to 35 per cent. Hence, the assumption of chemical equilibrium in molecular cloud simulations introduces intrinsic errors of a factor of up to 2 in chemical abundances, luminosities and luminosity ratios.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…