Optical Considerations for Large 3D Volumetric Particle Tracking Velocimetry

Abstract

The continual increase in computational power and the improvement of algorithms for particle tracking in the past decade have been making it feasible to track larger amounts of particles in 3D Volumetric Particle Tracking Velocimetry (3D-PTV) experiments. Also, the relatively recent introduction of 15 \: μ m Air Filled Soap Bubbles (AFSB) has been facilitating the usage of higher particle densities and hence the improvement of the spatial resolution of such measurements, compared with experiments that use 300 \: μ m Hellium-Filled Air Bubbles (HFSB). The trend to conduct 3D-PTV experiments with ever increasing larger volumes or at higher particle densities with smaller particles sets an ever increasing strain on the power of the illumination source and upon the image analysis. On one hand it requires a reliable model to estimate the signal level that is measured on a CMOS detector from a Mie scattering particle. On the other hand it requires also a model for estimating the limiting factors upon the image resolution where a large amount of particles within a volume are mapped into a 2D image. Here, we present a model that estimates numerically the signal level on a CMOS detector from a Mie scattering particle within an arbitrary large volume in a 3D-PTV experiment. The model considers the effect of the depth of field, particle density, Mie factor, laser pulse energy and other optical parameters. Thereafter, we investigate the physical limit of the image resolution depending on the depth of field and the density of point-like particles. Finally, we supply three real lab examples that illustrate how to use the relevant expressions of the models in order to estimate the signal level and the image resolution

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…