Height distributions in interface growth: The role of the averaging process
Abstract
To quantitatively characterize height distributions (HDs), one uses adimensional ratios of their first central moments (mn) or cumulants (n), especially the skewness S and kurtosis K, whose accurate estimate demands an averaging over all Ld points of the height profile at a given time, in translation-invariant interfaces, and over N independent samples. One way of doing this is by calculating mn(t) [or n(t)] for each sample and then carrying out an average of them for the N interfaces, with S and K being calculated only at the end. Another approach consists in directly calculating the ratios for each interface and, then, averaging the N values. It turns out, however, that S and K for the growth regime HDs display strong finite-size and -time effects when estimated from these "interface statistics", as already observed in some previous works and clearly shown here, through extensive simulations of several discrete growth models belonging to the EW and KPZ classes on 1D and 2D substrates of sizes L=const. and L t. Importantly, I demonstrate that with "1-point statistics'', i.e., by calculating mn(t) [or n(t)] once for all N Ld heights together, these corrections become very weak. However, I find that this "1-point'' approach fails in uncovering the universality of the HDs in the steady state regime (SSR) of systems whose average height, h, is a fluctuating variable. In fact, as demonstrated here, in this regime the 1-pt height evolves as h(t) = h(t) + sλ A1/2 Lα ζ + ·s -- where P(ζ) is the underlying SSR HD -- and the fluctuations in h yield S1pt t-1/2 and K1pt t-1. Nonetheless, by analyzing P(h-h), the cumulants of P(ζ) can be accurately determined.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.