Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions

Abstract

We present a lattice determination of the leading-order hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, aμ HVP, in the so-called short and intermediate time-distance windows, aμ SD and aμ W, defined by the RBC/UKQCD Collaboration [1]. We employ gauge ensembles produced by the Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC) with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 flavors of Wilson-clover twisted-mass quarks with masses of all the dynamical quark flavors tuned close to their physical values. The simulations are carried out at three values of the lattice spacing equal to 0.057, 0.068 and 0.080 fm with spatial lattice sizes up to L 7.6~fm. For the short distance window we obtain aμ SD( ETMC) = 69.27\,(34) · 10-10, which is consistent with the recent dispersive value of aμ SD(e+ e-) = 68.4\,(5) · 10-10 [2]. In the case of the intermediate window we get the value aμ W( ETMC) = 236.3\,(1.3) · 10-10, which is consistent with the result aμ W( BMW) = 236.7\,(1.4) · 10-10 [3] by the BMW collaboration as well as with the recent determination by the CLS/Mainz group of aμ W( CLS) = 237.30\,(1.46) · 10-10 [4]. However, it is larger than the dispersive result of aμ W(e+ e-) = 229.4\,(1.4) · 10-10 [2] by approximately 3.6 standard deviations. The tension increases to approximately 4.5 standard deviations if we average our ETMC result with those by BMW and CLS/Mainz. Our accurate lattice results in the short and intermediate windows point to a possible deviation of the e+ e- cross section data with respect to Standard Model predictions in the low and intermediate energy regions, but not in the high energy region.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…