Entanglement entropy and Page curve from the M-theory dual of thermal QCD above Tc at intermediate coupling

Abstract

Obtaining the Page curve in the context of eternal black holes associated with top-down non-conformal holographic thermal duals at intermediate coupling, has been entirely unexplored in the literature. We fill this gap in the context of a doubly holographic setup relevant to the M-theory dual of thermal QCD-like theories at T>Tc at intermediate coupling. Remarkably, excluding the higher derivative terms, the entanglement entropy(EE) of the Hawking radiation from the on-shell Wald EE (for appropriate choices of constants of integration appearing in the embeddings) increases almost linearly with the boundary time due to dominance of EE contribution from the Hartman-Maldacena(HM)-like surface SEEHM, β0, β lp6. Curiously, this imparts a "Swiss-Cheese" structure to the surface SEEHM, β0 at a given time (less than the Page time tP), in R≥0 × C effecting what could be dubbed as a "Large N Scenario" (LNS). Then, after tP, the EE contribution from the Island Surface (IS) SEEIS, β0 dominates and saturates the linear time growth of the EE of Hawking radiation and leads to the Page curve. Requiring SEEIS, β0/SBH2 up to LO in the non-conformal analog of "c GN(11)/rh9", and positivity of tP, set respectively a lower and upper bound on the horizon radius rh (the non-extremality parameter). With the inclusion of the O(R4) terms in M theory, the turning point associated with the HM-like surface/IS being in the deep IR, results in a relationship between lp and rh along with a conjectural e- O(1) N1/3-suppression (motivated by SEEIS, β0/SBH2). We obtain a hierarchy with respect to this N-dependent exponential in SEEHM, β0, SEEIS, β0 (O(β0)) and SEEHM, β, SEEHM, β (O(β)).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…