Vertex Partitions and Maximum -free Subgraphs

Abstract

We define a (V1, V2, …, Vk)-partition for a given graph H and graphical properties P1, P2, …, Pk as a partition where each Vi induces a subgraph of H with property Pi. Matamala (2007) extended this result by showing that for any graph H with (H)=p+q, there exists a (V1, V2)-partition of V(H) where H[V1] is a maximum order (p-1)-degenerate induced subgraph and H[V2] is (q-1)-degenerate. Additionally, Catlin and Lai proved that if (H)≥ 5, H has a (V1, V2)-partition such that H[V1] is a maximum order acyclic induced subgraph, ω(H[V2])≤ (H)-2, and (H[V2])≤ (H)-2. Rowshan and Taherkhani demonstrated that given a graph G with a minimum degree δ(G) and for k= (H)δ(G), there exists a (V1, V2, …, Vk)-partition of the vertex set of H, such that each H[Vi] is G-free, meaning it does not contain a subgraph isomorphic to G, and H[V1] is a maximum order G-free induced subgraph. In our paper, we present a novel result for a connected graph H with (H)≥ 5 and without K(H)+1 e as a subgraph. We establish that when p1≥ p2≥·s≥ pk-1≥ 2, pk≥ 4, Σi=1k pi=(H)-1+k, and Gi represents a family of graphs with a minimum degree at least pi-1 for each i∈ [k-1], a (V1, V2, …, Vk)-partition of V(H) exists. This partition guarantees that H[V1] is a maximum order G1-free induced subgraph, H[Vi] is Gi-free for each 2≤ i≤ k-1, (H[Vk])≤ pk, and either H[Vk] is Kpk-free or its pk-cliques are disjoint.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…