Causal Inference with Ranking Data: Application to Blame Attribution in Police Violence and Ballot Order Effects in Ranked-Choice Voting
Abstract
While rankings are at the heart of social science research, little is known about how to analyze ranking data in experimental studies. This paper introduces a potential-outcomes framework to perform causal inference when outcome data are ranking data. It introduces a class of causal estimands tailored to ranked outcomes and develops methods for estimation and inference. Furthermore, it extends the framework to partially ranked data. I show that partial rankings can be considered a selection problem and propose nonparametric sharp bounds for the treatment effects. Using the methods, I reanalyze the recent study on blame attribution in the Stephon Clark shooting, finding that people's attitudes toward officer-involved shootings are robust to contextual information. I also apply the framework to study ballot order effects in three ranked-choice voting (RCV) elections in 2022, proposing a new theory of pattern rankings in RCV. Finally, I present three applications in international relations.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.