On property-(R1) and relative Chebyshev centers in Banach spaces-II

Abstract

We continue to study (strong) property-(R1) in Banach spaces. As discussed by Pai \& Nowroji in [ On restricted centers of sets, J. Approx. Theory, 66(2), 170--189 (1991)], this study corresponds to a triplet (X,V,F), where X is a Banach space, V is a closed convex set, and F is a subfamily of closed, bounded subsets of X. It is observed that if X is a Lindenstrauss space then (X,BX,K(X)) has strong property-(R1), where K(X) represents the compact subsets of X. It is established that for any F∈K(X), CentBX(F)≠. This extends the well-known fact that a compact subset of a Lindenstrauss space X admits a nonempty Chebyshev center in X. We extend our observation that CentBX is Lipschitz continuous in K(X) if X is a Lindenstrauss space. If Y is a subspace of a Banach space X and F represents the set of all finite subsets of BX then we observe that BY exhibits the condition for simultaneously strongly proximinal (viz. property-(P1)) in X for F∈F if (X, Y, F(X)) satisfies strong property-(R1), where F(X) represents the set of all finite subsets of X. It is demonstrated that if P is a bi-contractive projection in ∞, then (∞, Range (P), K(∞)) exhibits the strong property-(R1), where K(∞) represents the set of all compact subsets of ∞. Furthermore, stability results for these properties are derived in continuous function spaces, which are then studied for various sums in Banach spaces.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…