A Comprehensive Study on Galaxies at z~9-16 Found in the Early JWST Data: UV Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star-Formation History at the Pre-Reionization Epoch

Abstract

We conduct a comprehensive study on dropout galaxy candidates at z9-16 using the first 90 arcmin2 JWST/NIRCam images taken by the early release observations (ERO) and early release science (ERS) programs. With the JWST simulation images, we find that a number of foreground interlopers are selected with a weak photo-z determination (2>4). We thus carefully apply a secure photo-z selection criterion (2>9) and conventional color criteria with confirmations of the ERO NIRSpec spectroscopic redshifts, and obtain a total of 23 dropout galaxies at z9-16, including two candidates at zphot=16.25-0.46+0.24 and 16.41-0.55+0.66. We perform thorough comparisons of dropout galaxies found in our work with recent JWST studies, and conclude that our galaxy sample is reliable enough for statistical analyses. We derive the UV luminosity functions at z9-16, and confirm that our UV luminosity functions at z 9 and 12 agree with those determined by other HST and JWST studies. The cosmic star-formation rate density decreases from z9 to 12, and perhaps to 16, but the densities at z12-16 are higher than the constant star formation efficiency model. Interestingly, there are six bright galaxy candidates at z10-16 with MUV<-19.5 mag and M*108-9 M. Because a majority (80\%) of these galaxies show no signatures of AGNs in their morphologies, the high cosmic star-formation rate densities and the existence of these UV-luminous galaxies are explained by no suppression of star-formation by the UV background radiation at the pre-reionization epoch and/or an efficient UV radiation production by a top-heavy IMF with Population III-like star formation.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…