Controlling the balance between remote, pinhole, and van der Waals epitaxy of Heusler films on graphene/sapphire

Abstract

Remote epitaxy on monolayer graphene is promising for synthesis of highly lattice mismatched materials, exfoliation of free-standing membranes, and re-use of expensive substrates. However, clear experimental evidence of a remote mechanism remains elusive. In many cases, due to contaminants at the transferred graphene/substrate interface, alternative mechanisms such as pinhole-seeded lateral epitaxy or van der Waals epitaxy can explain the resulting exfoliatable single-crystalline films. Here, we find that growth of the Heusler compound GdPtSb on clean graphene on sapphire substrates produces a 30 degree rotated epitaxial superstructure that cannot be explained by pinhole or van der Waals epitaxy. With decreasing growth temperature the volume fraction of this 30 degree domain increases compared to the direct epitaxial 0 degree domain, which we attribute to slower surface diffusion at low temperature that favors remote epitaxy, compared to faster surface diffusion at high temperature that favors pinhole epitaxy. We further show that careful graphene/substrate annealing (T 700 C) and consideration of the film/substrate vs film/graphene lattice mismatch are required to obtain epitaxy to the underlying substrate for a variety of other Heusler films, including LaPtSb and GdAuGe. The 30 degree rotated superstructure provides a possible experimental fingerprint of remote epitaxy since it is inconsistent with the leading alternative mechanisms.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…