A further extension of R\"odl's theorem

Abstract

Fix >0 and a nonnull graph H. A well-known theorem of R\"odl from the 80s says that every graph G with no induced copy of H contains a linear-sized -restricted set S⊂eq V(G), which means S induces a subgraph with maximum degree at most S in G or its complement. There are two extensions of this result: quantitatively, Nikiforov (and later Fox and Sudakov) relaxed the condition "no induced copy of H" into "at most G H induced copies of H for some >0 depending on H and "; and qualitatively, Chudnovsky, Scott, Seymour, and Spirkl recently showed that there exists N>0 depending on H and such that G is (N,)-restricted, which means V(G) has a partition into at most N subsets that are -restricted. A natural common generalization of these two asserts that every graph G with at most G H induced copies of H is (N,)-restricted for some ,N>0 depending on H and . This is unfortunately false, but we prove that for every >0, and N still exist so that for every d0, every graph with at most d H induced copies of H has an (N,)-restricted induced subgraph on at least G-d vertices. This unifies the two aforementioned theorems, and is optimal up to and N for every value of d.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…