Direct Sum Theorems From Fortification

Abstract

We revisit the direct sum questions in communication complexity which asks whether the resource needed to solve n communication problems together is (approximately) the sum of resources needed to solve these problems separately. Our work starts with the observation that Dinur and Meir's fortification lemma can be generalized to a general fortification lemma for a sub-additive measure over set. By applying this lemma to the case of cover number, we obtain a dual form of cover number, called "δ-fooling set" which is a generalized fooling set. Any rectangle which contains enough number of elements from a δ-fooling set can not be monochromatic. With this fact, we are able to reprove the classic direct sum theorem of cover number with a simple double counting argument. Formally, let S ⊂eq (A× B) × O and T ⊂eq (P× Q) × Z be two communication problems, Cov(S× T) ≥ Cov(S) + Cov(T) -|P||Q|-4. where Cov denotes the cover number. One issue of current deterministic direct sum theorems about communication complexity is that they provide no information when n is small, especially when n=2. In this work, we prove a new direct sum theorem about protocol size which imply a better direct sum theorem for two functions in terms of protocol size. Formally, let L denotes complexity of the protocol size of a communication problem, given a communication problem F:A × B → \0,1\, L(F× F)≥ L(F) +(L(F))-|A||B| -4. All our results are obtained in a similar way using the δ-fooling set to construct a hardcore for the direct sum problem.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…