Totally non-negativity of a family of change-of-basis matrices

Abstract

Let a=(a1, a2, …, an) and e=(e1, e2, …, en) be real sequences. Denote by M e→ a the (n+1)×(n+1) matrix whose (m,k) entry (m, k ∈ \0,…, n\) is the coefficient of the polynomial (x-a1)·s(x-ak) in the expansion of (x-e1)·s(x-em) as a linear combination of the polynomials 1, x-a1, …, (x-a1)·s(x-am). By appropriate choice of a and e the matrix M e→ a can encode many familiar doubly-indexed combinatorial sequences, such as binomial coefficients, Stirling numbers of both kinds, Lah numbers and central factorial numbers. In all four of these examples, M e→ a enjoys the property of total non-negativity -- the determinants of all its square submatrices are non-negative. This leads to a natural question: when, in general, is M e→ a totally non-negative? Galvin and Pacurar found a simple condition on e that characterizes total non-negativity of M e→ a when a is non-decreasing. Here we fully extend this result. For arbitrary real sequences a and e, we give a condition that can be checked in O(n2) time that determines whether M e→ a is totally non-negative. When M e→ a is totally non-negative, we witness this with a planar network whose weights are non-negative and whose path matrix is M e→ a. When it is not, we witness this with an explicit negative minor.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…