A note on local antimagic chromatic number of lexicographic product graphs

Abstract

Let G = (V,E) be a connected simple graph. A bijection f: E → \1,2,…,|E|\ is called a local antimagic labeling of G if f+(u) ≠ f+(v) holds for any two adjacent vertices u and v, where f+(u) = Σe∈ E(u) f(e) and E(u) is the set of edges incident to u. A graph G is called local antimagic if G admits at least a local antimagic labeling. The local antimagic chromatic number, denoted la(G), is the minimum number of induced colors taken over local antimagic labelings of G. Let G and H be two disjoint graphs. The graph G[H] is obtained by the lexicographic product of G and H. In this paper, we obtain sufficient conditions for la(G[H])≤ la(G)la(H). Consequently, we give examples of G and H such that la(G[H]) = (G)(H), where (G) is the chromatic number of G. We conjecture that (i) there are infinitely many graphs G and H such that la(G[H])=la(G)la(H) = (G)(H), and (ii) for k 1, la(G[H]) = (G)(H) if and only if (G)(H) = 2(H) + (H)k, where 2k+1 is the length of a shortest odd cycle in G.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…