Models of Bounded Arithmetic and variants of Pigeonhole Principle
Abstract
We give elementary proof that theory T12(R) augmented by the weak pigeonhole principle for all b1(R)-definable relations does not prove the bijective pigeonhole principle for R. This can be derived from known more general results but our proof yields a model of T12(R) in which ontoPHPn+1n(R) fails for some nonstandard element n while PHPm+1m holds for all b1(R)-definable relations and all m ≤ n1-ε, where ε > 0 is a fixed standard rational parameter. This can be seen as a step towards solving an open question posed by M. Ajtai.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.