Determinacy and reflection principles in second-order arithmetic

Abstract

It is known that several variations of the axiom of determinacy play important roles in the study of reverse mathematics, and the relation between the hierarchy of determinacy and comprehension are revealed by Tanaka, Nemoto, Montalb\'an, Shore, and others. We prove variations of a result by Koodziejczyk and Michalewski relating determinacy of arbitrary boolean combinations of 02 sets and reflection in second-order arithmetic. Specifically, we prove that: over ACA0, 12-Ref(ACA0) is equivalent to ∀ n.(01)n-Det*0; 13-Ref(11-CA0) is equivalent to ∀ n.(01)n-Det; and 13-Ref(12-CA0) is equivalent to ∀ n.(02)n-Det. We also restate results by Montalb\'an and Shore to show that 13-Ref(Z2) is equivalent to ∀ n.(03)n-Det over ACA0.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…