ArT\'eMiS imaging of the filamentary infrared dark clouds G1.75-0.08 and G11.36+0.80: Dust-based physical properties of the clouds and their clumps

Abstract

We imaged the infrared dark clouds (IRDCs) G1.75-0.08 and G11.36+0.80 at 350 μm and 450 μm using the ArT\'eMiS bolometer. These data were used in conjunction with our previous 870 μm observations with the Large APEX BOlometer CAmera (LABOCA). The clumps in G11.36+0.80 were also observed in the N2H+(1-0) transition with the IRAM 30-metre telescope. G1.75-0.08 was found to be composed of two cold (14.5 K), massive (several 103 M) clumps that are projectively separated by 3.7 pc. Both clumps are 70 μm dark, but they do not appear to be bounded by self-gravity. The G1.75-0.08 filament was found to be subcritical by a factor of 14 with respect to its critical line mass. G11.36+0.80 was found to be moderately (by a factor of 2) supercritical and composed of four clumps. The dust temperatures of the clumps are 13-15 K, and their masses are in the range 232-633 M. All the clumps are gravitationally bound. The projected, average separation of the clumps is 1 pc. A configuration that is observed in G1.75-0.08, namely two clumps at the ends of the filament, could be the result of gravitational focussing acting along the cloud. The two clumps fulfil the mass-radius threshold for high-mass star formation. Owing to the location of G1.75-0.08 near the Galactic centre (270 pc), environmental effects such as a high level of turbulence, tidal forces, and shearing motions could affect the cloud dynamics. The observed clump separation in G11.36+0.80 can be understood in terms of a sausage instability. The G11.36+0.80 clumps do not lie above the mass-radius threshold for high-mass star formation. The substructure observed in one of the clumps in G11.36+0.80 suggests that the IRDC has fragmented in a hierarchical fashion. This conforms to the filamentary paradigm for Galactic star formation.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…