The Complexity Classes of Hamming Distance Recoverable Robust Problems
Abstract
In the well-known complexity class NP are combinatorial problems, whose optimization counterparts are important for many practical settings. These problems typically consider full knowledge about the input. In practical settings, however, uncertainty in the input data is a usual phenomenon, whereby this is normally not covered in optimization versions of NP problems. One concept to model the uncertainty in the input data, is recoverable robustness. The instance of the recoverable robust version of a combinatorial problem P is split into a base scenario σ0 and an uncertainty scenario set S. The base scenario and all members of the uncertainty scenario set are instances of the original combinatorial problem P. The task is to calculate a solution s0 for the base scenario σ0 and solutions s for all uncertainty scenarios σ ∈ S such that s0 and s are not too far away from each other according to a distance measure, so s0 can be easily adapted to s. This paper introduces Hamming Distance Recoverable Robustness, in which solutions s0 and s have to be calculated, such that s0 and s may only differ in at most elements. We survey the complexity of Hamming distance recoverable robust versions of optimization problems, typically found in NP for different scenario encodings. The complexity is primarily situated in the lower levels of the polynomial hierarchy. The main contribution of the paper is a gadget reduction framework that shows that the recoverable robust versions of problems in a large class of combinatorial problems is P3-complete. This class includes problems such as Vertex Cover, Coloring or Subset Sum. Additionally, we expand the results to P2m+1-completeness for multi-stage recoverable robust problems with m ∈ N stages.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.