Refined list version of Hadwiger's conjecture
Abstract
Assume λ=\k1,k2, …, kq\ is a partition of kλ = Σi=1q ki. A λ-list assignment of G is a kλ-list assignment L of G such that the colour set v ∈ V(G)L(v) can be partitioned into |λ|= q sets C1,C2,…,Cq such that for each i and each vertex v of G, |L(v) Ci| ki. We say G is λ-choosable if G is L-colourable for any λ-list assignment L of G. The concept of λ-choosability is a refinement of choosability that puts k-choosability and k-colourability in the same framework. If |λ| is close to kλ, then λ-choosability is close to kλ-colourability; if |λ| is close to 1, then λ-choosability is close to kλ-choosability. This paper studies Hadwiger's Conjecture in the context of λ-choosability. Hadwiger's Conjecture is equivalent to saying that every Kt-minor-free graph is \1 (t-1)\-choosable for any positive integer t. We prove that for t 5, for any partition λ of t-1 other than \1 (t-1)\, there is a Kt-minor-free graph G that is not λ-choosable. We then construct several types of Kt-minor-free graphs that are not λ-choosable, where kλ - (t-1) gets larger as kλ-|λ| gets larger. In partcular, for any q and any ε > 0, there exists t0 such that for any t t0, for any partition λ of (2-ε)t with |λ| =q, there is a Kt-minor-free graph that is not λ-choosable. The q=1 case of this result was recently proved by Steiner, and our proof uses a similar argument. We also generalize this result to (a,b)-list colouring.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.