Prophet Inequalities for Cost Minimization

Abstract

Prophet inequalities for rewards maximization are fundamental to optimal stopping theory with extensive applications to mechanism design and online optimization. We study the cost minimization counterpart of the classical prophet inequality: a decision maker is facing a sequence of costs X1, X2, …, Xn drawn from known distributions in an online manner and must ``stop'' at some point and take the last cost seen. The goal is to compete with a ``prophet'' who can see the realizations of all Xi's upfront and always select the minimum, obtaining a cost of E[i Xi]. If the Xi's are not identically distributed, no strategy can achieve a bounded approximation, even for random arrival order and n = 2. This leads us to consider the case where the Xi's are independent and identically distributed (I.I.D.). For the I.I.D. case, we show that if the distribution satisfies a mild condition, the optimal stopping strategy achieves a (distribution-dependent) constant-factor approximation to the prophet's cost. Moreover, for MHR distributions, this constant is at most 2. All our results are tight. We also demonstrate an example distribution that does not satisfy the condition and for which the competitive ratio of any algorithm is infinite. Turning our attention to single-threshold strategies, we design a threshold that achieves a O(polylogn)-factor approximation, where the exponent in the logarithmic factor is a distribution-dependent constant, and we show a matching lower bound. Finally, we note that our results can be used to design approximately optimal posted price-style mechanisms for procurement auctions which may be of independent interest. Our techniques utilize the hazard rate of the distribution in a novel way, allowing for a fine-grained analysis which could find further applications in prophet inequalities.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…