On the Equivalence, Stabilisers, and Feet of Buekenhout-Tits Unitals

Abstract

This paper addresses a number of problems concerning Buekenhout-Tits unitals in PG(2,q2), where q = 2e+1 and e ≥ 1. We show that all Buekenhout-Tits unitals are PGL-equivalent (addressing an open problem in [S. Barwick and G. L. Ebert. Unitals in projective planes. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2008.]), explicitly describe their P L-stabiliser (expanding Ebert's work in [G.L. Ebert. Buekenhout-Tits unitals. J. Algebraic. Combin. 6.2 (1997), 133-140], and show that lines meet the feet of points no on ∞ in at most four points. Finally, we show that feet of points not on ∞ are not always a \0,1,2,4\-set, in contrast to what happens for Buekenhout-Metz unitals [N. Abarz\'ua, R. Pomareda, and O. Vega. Feet in orthogonal-Buekenhout-Metz unitals. Adv. Geom. 18.2 (2018), 229-236].

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…