Hyperstable Sets with Voting and Algorithmic Hardness Applications

Abstract

The noise stability of a Euclidean set A with correlation is the probability that (X,Y)∈ A× A, where X,Y are standard Gaussian random vectors with correlation ∈(0,1). It is well-known that a Euclidean set of fixed Gaussian volume that maximizes noise stability must be a half space. For a partition of Euclidean space into m>2 parts each of Gaussian measure 1/m, it is still unknown what sets maximize the sum of their noise stabilities. In this work, we classify partitions maximizing noise stability that are also critical points for the derivative of noise stability with respect to . We call a partition satisfying these conditions hyperstable. Uner the assumption that a maximizing partition is hyperstable, we prove: * a (conditional) version of the Plurality is Stablest Conjecture for 3 or 4 candidates. * a (conditional) sharp Unique Games Hardness result for MAX-m-CUT for m=3 or 4 * a (conditional) version of the Propeller Conjecture of Khot and Naor for 4 sets. We also show that a symmetric set that is hyperstable must be star-shaped. For partitions of Euclidean space into m>2 parts of fixed (but perhaps unequal) Gaussian measure, the hyperstable property can only be satisfied when all of the parts have Gaussian measure 1/m. So, as our main contribution, we have identified a possible strategy for proving the full Plurality is Stablest Conjecture and the full sharp hardness for MAX-m-CUT: to prove both statements, it suffices to show that sets maximizing noise stability are hyperstable. This last point is crucial since any proof of the Plurality is Stablest Conjecture must use a property that is special to partitions of sets into equal measures, since the conjecture is false in the unequal measure case.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…