Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom
Abstract
We show that quantum states with "low stabilizer complexity" can be efficiently distinguished from Haar-random. Specifically, given an n-qubit pure state |, we give an efficient algorithm that distinguishes whether | is (i) Haar-random or (ii) a state with stabilizer fidelity at least 1k (i.e., has fidelity at least 1k with some stabilizer state), promised that one of these is the case. With black-box access to |, our algorithm uses O\!( k12 (1/δ)) copies of | and O\!(n k12 (1/δ)) time to succeed with probability at least 1-δ, and, with access to a state preparation unitary for | (and its inverse), O\!( k3 (1/δ)) queries and O\!(n k3 (1/δ)) time suffice. As a corollary, we prove that ω((n)) T-gates are necessary for any Clifford+T circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, a first-of-its-kind lower bound.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.