Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions''
Abstract
In a recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 087001, (2022)], Masuki, Sudo, Oshikawa, and Ashida studied a Josephson junction, with Josephson energy E J and charging energy E C, shunted by an ohmic transmission line with conductance α (2e)2/h. Their model includes a realistic high frequency cutoff of order α Ec, that is typically smaller than the plasma frequency W. The authors present a phase diagram showing surprising features, not anticipated in the established literature [eg. Sch\"on and Zaikin, Phys. Reports 198, 237, (1990)]. For E J/E C above a certain value, they find that the junction remains superconducting for all α, while below this value, they find that the insulating phase leads to re-entrant superconductivity at small α. In this Comment, we show that their Numerical Renormalization Group (NRG) implementation is uncontrolled, and that there is no evidence for the re-entrant superconductivity in the phase diagram presented in Fig. 1a of PRL 129, 087001.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.