The category 2, derived modifications, and deformation theory of monoidal categories

Abstract

A complex C(C,D)(F,G)(η, θ), generalising the Davydov-Yetter complex of a monoidal category, is constructed. Here C,D are -linear (dg) monoidal categories, F,G C D are -linear (dg) strict monoidal functors, η,θ F⇒ G are monoidal natural transformations. Morally, it is a complex of ``derived modifications'' η θ, likewise for the case of dg categories one has the complex of ``derived natural transformations'' F⇒ G, given by the Hochschild cochain complex of C with coefficients in C-bimodule D(F-,G=). As well, an intrinsic homological algebra interpretation of C(C,D)(F,G)(η,θ) as RHom in an abelian category of 2-bimodules over C, is provided. The complex C(C,D)(F,G)(η,θ) naturally arises from a 2-cocellular dg vector space A(C,D)(F,G)(η,θ) 2 C(), as its 2-totalization (here 2 is the category dual to the category of Joyal 2-disks). It is shown that H3(C(C,C)(Id,Id)(id,id))) is isomorphic to the vector space of the outer infinitesimal deformations of the -linear monoidal category which we call full deformations. It means that the following data is to be deformed: (a) the underlying dg category structure, (b) the monoidal product on morphisms (the monoidal product on objects is a set-theoretical datum and is maintained under the deformation), (c) the associator. It is shown that C(C,D)(F,F)(id,id) is a homotopy e2-algebra. Conjecturally, C(C,C)(Id,Id)(id,id) is a homotopy e3-algebra; however the proof requires more sophisticated methods and we hope to complete it in our next paper.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…