Heavy and Light Paths and Hamilton Cycles
Abstract
Given a graph G, we denote by f(G,u0,k) the number of paths of length k in G starting from u0. In graphs of maximum degree 3, with edge weights i.i.d. with exp(1), we provide a simple proof showing that (under the assumption that f(G,u0,k)=ω(1)) the expected weight of the heaviest path of length k in G starting from u0 is at least align* (1-o(1))(k+2(f(G,u0,k))2), align* and the expected weight of the lightest path of length k in G starting from u0 is at most align* (1+o(1))(k-2(f(G,u0,k))2). align* We demonstrate the immediate implication of this result for Hamilton paths and Hamilton cycles in random cubic graphs, where we show that typically there exist paths and cycles of such weight as well. Finally, we discuss the connection of this result to the question of a longest cycle in the giant component of supercritical G(n,p).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.