When are the natural embeddings of classical invariant rings pure?

Abstract

Consider a reductive linear algebraic group G acting linearly on a polynomial ring S over an infinite field; key examples are the general linear group, the symplectic group, the orthogonal group, and the special linear group, with the classical representations as in Weyl's book: for the general linear group, consider a direct sum of copies of the standard representation and copies of the dual; in the other cases take copies of the standard representation. The invariant rings in the respective cases are determinantal rings, rings defined by Pfaffians of alternating matrices, symmetric determinantal rings, and the Pl\"ucker coordinate rings of Grassmannians; these are the classical invariant rings of the title, with SG⊂eq S being the natural embedding. Over a field of characteristic zero, a reductive group is linearly reductive, and it follows that the invariant ring SG is a pure subring of S, equivalently, SG is a direct summand of S as an SG-module. Over fields of positive characteristic, reductive groups are typically no longer linearly reductive. We determine, in the positive characteristic case, precisely when the inclusion SG⊂eq S is pure. It turns out that if SG⊂eq S is pure, then either the invariant ring SG is regular, or the group G is linearly reductive.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…