Multicolor Ramsey Number for Double Stars

Abstract

For a graph H and an integer k1, let r(H;k) and r(H;k) denote the k-color Ramsey number and list Ramsey number of H, respectively. Alon, Buci\'c, Kalvari, Kuperwasser and Szab\'o in 2021 initiated the systematic study of list Ramsey numbers of graphs and hypergraphs, and conjectured that r(K1,n;k) and r(K1,n;k) are always equal. Motivated by their work, we study the k-color Ramsey number for double stars S(n,m), where n m1. To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the exact value of r(S(n,m);k) when k3. A classic result of Erdos and Graham from 1975 asserts that r(T;k)>k(n-1)+1 for every tree T with n 1 edges and k sufficiently large such that n divides k-1. Using a folklore double counting argument in set system and the edge chromatic number of complete graphs, we prove that if k is odd and n is sufficiently large compared with m and k, then \[ r(S(n,m);k)=kn+m+2.\] This is a step in our effort to determine whether r(S(n,m);k) and r(S(n,m);k) are always equal, which remains wide open. We also prove that r(Smn;k)=k(n-1)+m+2 if k is odd and n is sufficiently large compared with m and k, where 1 m n and Smn is obtained from K1, n by subdividing m edges each exactly once. We end the paper with some observations towards the list Ramsey number for S(n,m) and Smn.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…