Lattice Problems Beyond Polynomial Time

Abstract

We study the complexity of lattice problems in a world where algorithms, reductions, and protocols can run in superpolynomial time, revisiting four foundational results: two worst-case to average-case reductions and two protocols. We also show a novel protocol. 1. We prove that secret-key cryptography exists if O(n)-approximate SVP is hard for 2 n-time algorithms. I.e., we extend to our setting (Micciancio and Regev's improved version of) Ajtai's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from O(n)-approximate SVP to SIS. 2. We prove that public-key cryptography exists if O(n)-approximate SVP is hard for 2 n-time algorithms. This extends to our setting Regev's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from O(n1.5)-approximate SVP to LWE. In fact, Regev's reduction is quantum, but ours is classical, generalizing Peikert's polynomial-time classical reduction from O(n2)-approximate SVP. 3. We show a 2 n-time coAM protocol for O(1)-approximate CVP, generalizing the celebrated polynomial-time protocol for O(n/ n)-CVP due to Goldreich and Goldwasser. These results show complexity-theoretic barriers to extending the recent line of fine-grained hardness results for CVP and SVP to larger approximation factors. (This result also extends to arbitrary norms.) 4. We show a 2 n-time co-non-deterministic protocol for O( n)-approximate SVP, generalizing the (also celebrated!) polynomial-time protocol for O(n)-CVP due to Aharonov and Regev. 5. We give a novel coMA protocol for O(1)-approximate CVP with a 2 n-time verifier. All of the results described above are special cases of more general theorems that achieve time-approximation factor tradeoffs.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…