Comparison of the Core-Collapse Evolution of Two Nearly Equal Mass Progenitors
Abstract
We compare the core-collapse evolution of a pair of 15.8 M stars with significantly different internal structures, a consequence of bimodal variability exhibited by massive stars during their late evolutionary stages. The 15.78 and 15.79 M progenitors have core masses of 1.47 and 1.78 M and compactness parameters 1.75 of 0.302 and 0.604. The core collapse simulations are carried out in 2D to nearly 3 s post-bounce and show substantial differences in the times of shock revival and explosion energies. The 15.78 M model explodes promptly at 120 ms post-bounce when a strong density decrement at the Si--Si/O shell interface encounters the stalled shock. The 15.79 M model, which lacks the density decrement, takes 100 ms longer to explode but ultimately produces a more powerful explosion. Larger mass accretion rate of the 15.79 M model during the first 0.8 s post-bounce results in larger e/ e luminosities and rms energies. The e/ e luminosities and rms energies arising from the inner core are also larger in the 15.79 M model throughout due to the larger negative temperature gradient of this core due to greater adiabatic compression. Larger luminosities and rms energies in the 15.79 M model and a flatter and higher density heating region, result in more energy deposition behind the shock and more ejected matter with higher enthalpy. We find the ejected 56Ni mass of the 15.79 M model is more than double that of the 15.78 M model. Most of the ejecta in both models is moderately proton-rich, though counterintuitively the highest electron fraction (Ye=0.61) ejecta in either model is in the less energetic 15.78 M model while the lowest electron fraction (Ye=0.45) ejecta in either model is in the 15.79 M model.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.