Realizability of Iso-g2 Processes via Effective Pair Interactions

Abstract

An outstanding problem in statistical mechanics is the determination of whether prescribed functional forms of the pair correlation function g2(r) [or equivalently, structure factor S(k)] at some number density can be achieved by d-dimensional many-body systems. The Zhang-Torquato conjecture states that any realizable set of pair statistics, whether from a nonequilibrium or equilibrium system, can be achieved by equilibrium systems involving up to two-body interactions. In light of this conjecture, we study the realizability problem of the nonequilibrium iso-g2 process, i.e., the determination of density-dependent effective potentials that yield equilibrium states in which g2 remains invariant for a positive range of densities. Using a precise inverse methodology that determines effective potentials that match hypothesized functional forms of g2(r) for all r and S(k) for all k, we show that the unit-step function g2, which is the zero-density limit of the hard-sphere potential, is remarkably numerically realizable up to the packing fraction φ=0.49 for d=1. For d=2 and 3, it is realizable up to the maximum ``terminal'' packing fraction φc=1/2d, at which the systems are hyperuniform, implying that the explicitly known necessary conditions for realizability are sufficient up through φc. For φ near but below φc, the large-r behaviors of the effective potentials are given exactly by the functional forms [-(φ) r] for d=1, r-1/2[-(φ) r] for d=2, and r-1[-(φ) r] (Yukawa form) for d=3, where -1(φ) is a screening length, and for φ=φc, the potentials at large r are given by the pure Coulomb forms in the respective dimensions, as predicted by Torquato and Stillinger [Phys. Rev. E, 68, 041113 1-25 (2003)].

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…