On linear diameter perfect Lee codes with diameter 6
Abstract
In 1968, Golomb and Welch conjectured that there is no perfect Lee codes with radius r2 and dimension n3. A diameter perfect code is a natural generalization of the perfect code. In 2011, Etzion (IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 57(11): 7473--7481, 2011) proposed the following problem: Are there diameter perfect Lee (DPL, for short) codes with diameter greater than four besides the DPL(3,6) code? Later, Horak and AlBdaiwi (IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 58(8): 5490--5499, 2012) conjectured that there are no DPL(n,d) codes for dimension n3 and diameter d>4 except for (n,d)=(3,6). In this paper, we give a counterexample to this conjecture. Moreover, we prove that for n3, there is a linear DPL(n,6) code if and only if n=3,11.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.