On the homogeneity of SnIa absolute magnitude in the Pantheon+ sample

Abstract

We have analysed the Pantheon+ sample using a new likelihood model that replaces the single SnIa absolute magnitude parameter M used in the standard likelihood model of Brout et. al. with two absolute magnitude parameters M<, M> and a transition distance dcrit that determines the distance at which M changes from M< to M>. The use of this likelihood dramatically changes the quality of fit to the Pantheon+ sample for a background by 2=-19.6. The tension between the M< and M> best fit values is at a level more than 3σ with a best fit dcrit very close to 20Mpc. The origin of this improvement of fit and M<-M> tension is that the new likelihood model, successfully models two signals hidden in the data: 1. The well known systematic effect called 'volumetric redshift scatter bias' which is due to asymmetric peculiar velocity variations at redshifts z<0.01 induced by unequal projected volumes at lower and higher distances compared to a given distance and 2. A mild signal for a change of intrinsic SnIa luminosity at about 20Mpc. This interpretation of the results is confirmed by truncating the z<0.01 Hubble diagram data from Pantheon+ where the above systematic is dominant and showing that the M<-M> tension decreases from above 3σ to a little less than 2σ. It is also confirmed by a Monte Carlo simulation comparing the SnIa absolute luminosities Mi of SnIa+Cepheid hosts, with the anticipated luminosities in the context of a homogeneous single absolute magnitude M. This simulation shows that the maximum significance of the SnIa luminosity transition ( |M>-M<|σM>2+σM<2) in the real data, is larger than the corresponding maximum significance of 94\% of the corresponding homogeneous simulated samples.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…