Inference of the optical depth to reionization τ from Planck CMB maps with convolutional neural networks

Abstract

The optical depth to reionization, τ, is the least constrained parameter of the cosmological model. To date, its most precise value is inferred from large-scale polarized CMB power spectra from the Planck High-Frequency Instrument (HFI). These maps are known to contain significant contamination by residual non-Gaussian systematic effects, which are hard to model analytically. Therefore, robust constraints on τ are currently obtained through an empirical cross-spectrum likelihood built from simulations. In this paper, we present a likelihood-free inference of τ from polarized Planck HFI maps which, for the first time, is fully based on neural networks (NNs). NNs have the advantage of not requiring an analytical description of the data and can be trained on state-of-the-art simulations, combining information from multiple channels. By using Gaussian sky simulations and Planck SRoll2 simulations, including CMB, noise, and residual instrumental systematic effects, we train, test and validate NN models considering different setups. We infer the value of τ directly from Q and U maps at 4 pixel resolution, without computing power spectra. On Planck data, we obtain τNN=0.058 0.008, compatible with current EE cross-spectrum results but with a 30\% larger uncertainty, which can be assigned to the inherent non-optimality of our estimator and to the retraining procedure applied to avoid biases. While this paper does not improve on current cosmological constraints, our analysis represents a first robust application of NN-based inference on real data and highlights its potential as a promising tool for complementary analysis of near-future CMB experiments, also in view of the ongoing challenge to achieve a detection of primordial gravitational waves.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…