The optical light curve of GRB 221009A: the afterglow and the emerging supernova

Abstract

We present extensive optical photometry of the afterglow of GRB~221009A. Our data cover 0.9 - 59.9\,days from the time of Swift and Fermi GRB detections. Photometry in rizy-band filters was collected primarily with Pan-STARRS and supplemented by multiple 1- to 4-meter imaging facilities. We analyzed the Swift X-ray data of the afterglow and found a single decline rate power-law f(t) t-1.5560.002 best describes the light curve. In addition to the high foreground Milky Way dust extinction along this line of sight, the data favour additional extinction to consistently model the optical to X-ray flux with optically thin synchrotron emission. We fit the X-ray-derived power-law to the optical light curve and find good agreement with the measured data up to 5-6\,days. Thereafter we find a flux excess in the riy bands which peaks in the observer frame at 20\,days. This excess shares similar light curve profiles to the type Ic broad-lined supernovae SN~2016jca and SN~2017iuk once corrected for the GRB redshift of z=0.151 and arbitrarily scaled. This may be representative of a supernova emerging from the declining afterglow. We measure rest-frame absolute peak AB magnitudes of Mg=-19.80.6 and Mr=-19.40.3 and Mz=-20.10.3. If this is an SN component, then Bayesian modelling of the excess flux would imply explosion parameters of M ej=7.1+2.4-1.7 M, M Ni=1.0+0.6-0.4 M, and v ej=33,900+5,900-5,700 kms-1, for the ejecta mass, nickel mass and ejecta velocity respectively, inferring an explosion energy of E kin 2.6-9.0×1052 ergs.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…